If you seriously going to complain about fictional characters, then I believe that you are just projecting. Many such cases: https://mega.nz/file/4Qck3QJD#ZXr01JWzc6cb2ret261JlvJ2kUrFbeL7Em--4A0NYN8
LeoTheFurryIf people come here to so-called "rant", that is their moral compass saying that that is wrong. And if you get that as much as you have to put in the description of this playlist, then you should at least see the problem here. Don't get mad at me, just Please note that CP is a real-world extreme problem, so don't make a mistake and go defending them.about 3 days ago
1
LeoTheFurryThe "Appears to be" Standard: As of May 2026, the legal standard in most of the US, Canada (under the updated Online Harms framework), and the UK has shifted. It no longer matters what the "lore" or the artist's caption says. If a character has the biological markers of a child (proportions, limb size, facial features), it is legally categorized as a depiction of a minor. The "30-year-old" caption is now legally seen as an admission of guilt or an attempt to bypass filters, rather than a valid defense.about 4 days ago
CortisolMfers that do consume it are closeted fellows of Diddy himself because what other fictional material would satisfy their thirst when its so scarce on the netabout 7 days ago